The dominant focus of traditional theories on state and distribution of . Table of Contents Table of Contents. After all, these were Cold War institutions whose purpose was now over with the end of superpower politics. (2019). Constructivists used this logic in early efforts to contrast their work with more established rationalist perspectives on world politics (see especially Finnemore 1996) because the logic of appropriateness contends that actors in world politics undertake actions that are appropriate for their particular identity. Security communities. Although some debate exists over whether it is more of an approach rather than a theory (McCourt 2016, p. 476), its importance for international relations can be found in its emphasis on social relations between actors; how actors relate to each other shapes international politics. Other articles where constructivism is discussed: international relations: Constructivism: In the late 20th century the study of international relations was increasingly influenced by constructivism. In order to better understand compliance with and contestation over norms either in isolation or together, it is necessary to pay more attention to the prior understanding of who is in the community. [1] [3] It brought former Warsaw Pact nations into its fold and strengthened convergence around normative issues such as human rights through social learning (Gheciu 2005; Fierke and Wiener 1999). Certainly actors are strategic, but constructivist logic dictates that the normative context defines and shapes that strategic behavior (Muller 2004). Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2003). These criticisms are predominantly about where constructivism claims to fit in IR (as the middle ground between rationalist and reflectivist approaches) and its methodological commitments. Like its revision of anarchy as an ordering principle in international relations, constructivism also changed perceptions about the relationship between agents and structures, brought attention to how ideas matter as much as material factors, and how identity, norms, and culture shape global relations. Writing in the 1950s, Karl Deutsch differentiated between amalgamated and pluralistic security communities, with the former referring to a security community with a shared government, and the latter involving an integrated yet separated political structure. 3536). Some scholars have sought a way through or out of the logic of appropriateness/logic of consequences debate by following March and Olsens (1998) suggestions about scrutinizing the relationship between the logics, especially possible temporal sequencing of the logics, theorizing that sometimes actors calculate optimal material courses and at others they reason about their normative/identity obligations (Shannon 2000; Nielson, Tierney, and Weaver 2006; see Muller 2004 for a caution on this synthesis strategy). But norms are never static and this meaning has also changed over time for instance, with the rise of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), sovereignty as an institution has become contingent on states fulfilling certain criteria such as not committing human rights abuse. New York: M. E. Sharpe. Security institutions as agents of socialization? Two types of normative dynamics can be identified: the first is endogenous contestation; the second is compliance or diffusion. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. 2. They demonstrated that constructivism consisted of more than a metatheoretical critique of rational/material approaches and could indeed be used to structure rigorous empirical investigations across the spectrum of issues in international relations. Pouliot and Adler draw on Bourdieu to develop a logic of practice and Hopf devised a logic of habit to reflect these concerns. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319363. Weber, C. (1999). Critical methodology and constructivism. Introduction to special section: from Nordic exceptionalism to a third order priority variations of Nordicness in foreign and security policy. Arguments over the different actions feed back and alter the meaning of the original norms. An example of this can be seen in the case of Libya in 2011, which is broadly hailed as a successful R2P intervention. The traditional theories (Idealism and Realism) had diverted all focus to state and Power. One of the big problems for rationalists, (When considering critiques of constructivism, it is important to note that those critiques are guided by the underlying epistemological and ontological positions of rationalist or other forms of theorizing.) The logic of arguing has inspired the development of significant empirical research (e.g., Muller 2004; Bjola 2005; Leiteritz 2005; Mitzen 2005) and it is the foundation for some approaches to reasoning about social norms (the logic of consequences is also implicated in approaches that consider that actors reason about norms). International Organization, 52(4), 887917. Van Kersbergen and Verbeek (2007:221) go so far as to posit that this vagueness is actually designed into norms to facilitate maximum adherence. New York: Columbia University Press. International relations require various perspectives to comprehend the complexity of the interactions that take place in the international sphere. After making the case that norms matter and developing a number of theoretical frameworks to show how norms emerge, spread, and influence behavior, norms-oriented constructivists have shifted their attention to a new set of questions, and in particular compliance with the strictures of social norms and change in norms themselves. This chapter will concentrate on some of the main elements that have relevance for military studies. Considering other factors to explain why states behave the way they do. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(5), 721742. (1996). Adler, E. (1997). First, the compliance and norm change research agenda (loosely defined) is more internally focused than the previous wave of norms-oriented research. International Relations is in Social Studies, thus this study field tries to theorize a model that could explain everything that is going on between countries. Norms and regulatory instruments around the use of PMSCs and in what capacity they are used have emerged with the view to regulating them (Percy 2016, p. 221). Constructivism sees power in terms of what it does and means (Guzzini 2005); ideas have power (e.g., that democracies are good). Constructivists hold that . Those facts that rely on human agreement (institutional facts) differ from brute facts (like mountains, for example), which do not need human institutions for their existence. States interactions are socially constructed. Philosophy of military sciences. When interacting with external norms, the targets of socialization reason about and in some cases manipulate the social norms (international or domestic) that shape their behavior. 1516). The second is compliance or diffusion actors from different normative communities seek to enlarge their communities or to hold on to extant norms in the face of external normative challenges and disputes that arise can lead to normative change in both communities. To gain acceptance and make the case that constructivist ideas mattered empirically, constructivists endeavored to demonstrate how their ideational perspective could provide superior understanding and explanation of political phenomena. It is ideas, according to constructivists, that play a large role in determining how actors act. 317356). Mlksoo, M. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: Constructivist treatment of social context and its limitations. Critical constructivists pay greater attention to issues of power and dominant discourses that construct national identity.. Introduction. International Relations: Constructivism pt1 1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, You can also search for this author in Social Constructivism, especially after the 1980s, has become a common approach in dealing with and examining different issues in the field of humanities and social sciences. From the perspective of those who work on norms, there are very good reasons to focus on static and specific norms when analyzing international relations. These studies were inclined to treat social norms as independent variables and show how some political behavior is made possible or constrained by such ideational factors (e.g., Barkin and Cronin 1994; Klotz 1995; Finnemore 1996, 2003; Katzenstein 1996; Legro 1996; Price 1997; Tannenwald 1999). Katzenstein, P. J. On the contrary, this analytic device has a deep history in the sociological and economic literatures. Zehfuss, M. (2002). The culture of national security. You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Wiener (2004:191, 192) notes that this behavioralist approach operates with stable norms and is best suited to inferring and predicting behavior by referring to a particular category of norms that entail standards for behavior. While these studies unveiled how the norms they examined contributed to dynamic political processes, they tended to hold the norms themselves constant. Social constructivism is well suited to address continuous changes in European integration. However, this focus did little to advance understanding of how norms themselves change without necessarily being replaced (Van Kersbergen and Verbeek 2007; Hoffmann 2005; Chwieroth 2008; Sandholtz 2008). The inescapable tension between general rules and specific actions ceaselessly casts up disputes which in turn generate arguments, which then reshape both rules and conduct. The logical chain from general norms to contestation is not long. The article argues that constructivism suffers from the same limitations as any other paradigm in IR, therefore, there is no reason to exclude this theory from forecasting effort. While constructivists know that social norms are always being reconstituted in the dynamic interplay of agents and social structures known as mutual constitution, social norms do elicit common behavioral expectations such that they are recognizable as relatively stable shared ideas. Even among security communities such as the Nordic states, different strategic cultures can be found because they are informed by a range of historical and cultural experiences, with different experiences of war and conflict, membership of alliances, and other factors (see special issues of Cooperation and Conflict (2005) and Global Affairs (2018) for further discussions). Conformance how social norms as intersubjective objects stabilize expectations and even bound what is considered to be possible (Yee 1996) was a crucial area for constructivists because without evidence of conformance with the strictures of social norms, constructivists could not demonstrate that norms mattered. Cham: Springer. Sandholtz (2008) himself proposes a cyclical model to explain the evolution of norms prohibiting wartime plunder. Staff & Defence College, Norwegian Defence University College, Oslo, Norway, Norwegian Defence University College / Norwegian Military Academy, Oslo, Norway. B., & Heikka, H. (2005). The constructivist focus on norms is important for understanding teleological aspects of its idea of international relations that ideas can change world politics (Hopf 1998). Google Scholar. Save. Constructivism considers the relations between states (and other actors) as a social realm; less about the distribution of resources and power and more about the distribution of ideas. The causes of the Iraq war. What makes the UK feel safe in the matter of the USAs nuclear arsenal is that these states have a shared identity centuries of connection, friendship, shared beliefs and language, and similar cultures. Constructivists also emphasize how domestic norms and values play a role in how states and their militaries approach conflict or understand the causes of conflict. forthcoming). The market for ontological security. Norms, identity, and their limits: A theoretical reprise. Download. [1] [2] [3] The most important ideational factors are those that are collectively held; these collectively held beliefs construct the interests and identities of actors. ), Handbook of military sciences (pp. Haas, P. M. (2016). 23) and recognized as a medium of exchange for goods and services. e. In international relations, constructivism is a social theory that asserts that significant aspects of international relations are shaped by ideational factors. Alexander Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics has been predicted to gain a status similar to that which Kenneth Waltz's Theory of International Politics is thought to have enjoyed in the 1980s. While constructivists do not deny the importance of material factors, they also argue that ideas also matter, and in some cases, matter more. (2017). While early constructivist theorizing proved to be an exciting new avenue for thinking about international relations in the abstract, both constructivists and their critics were eager to see constructivist theory applied empirically. Critiques of constructivism tend to come from three areas: rationalist criticisms, issues over how constructivists see identity, and finally, criticism that constructivism is apolitical. Norms were conceptualized as having specific behavioral strictures (a relatively bounded set of appropriate behaviors) that did not change. Another topic that requires further consideration in future research is the relationship between intersubjective and subjective reality. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(1), 2543. Bibliographical References Adler, E. (1997). These dual visions of normative dynamics are likely related, but the norms literature has yet to describe how. The Athenians demand that neutral Melos side with them against Sparta. Constructivism had been marginalized by these mainstream theories because it focused on social construction instead of material construction (Barkin, 2017). This chapter will take the reader through the key ideas of social constructivism also referred to as constructivism in this chapter showing how norms, culture, and ideas about identity shape actors, condition their relations with each other, and can impact the so-called given nature of international relations and transform understandings of power relations. Social theory of international politics. Norms and identity in world politics. Yet, constructivists are beginning to define their enterprise more independently of competing approaches. Hegemony, entrepreneurial leadership, domestic context, framing, moral argument, and epistemic community actions figured prominently in these works as the impetus for emergence (Ikenberry and Kupchan 1990; Haas 1992; Finnemore and Sikkink 1998; Keck and Sikkink 1998; Risse 2000). Schmidt, B. Critical constructivists prefer to examine state identity in terms of its wider story (Fierke and Jrgensen 2001). Critics too began to understand social norms as static and specific and this facilitated an erroneous notion that evidence of norm-breaking behavior somehow invalidated or falsified constructivist theorizing. PubMedGoogle Scholar. Norm shift around the idea of sovereignty can be seen in the pillars of R2P that say that if a state cannot or will not stop human rights abuses within its own territory, other states have a compelling reason to intervene. Baylis revision International Relations. This social learning aspect differs from realisms prescriptive approach that says nations will follow the strongest militaries to develop their strength and technological prowess with the anarchic structure of the international system guiding this logic. Only those with equal power could make such demands, and the Athenians make good on their threat to destroy the Melians, declaring that might is right and the weak suffer what they must (Thucydides 1951, pp. Norms and Social Constructivism in International Relations | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies Social norms were conceptualized as aspects of social structure that emerged from the actions and beliefs of actors in specific communities; norms shaped those actions and beliefs by constituting actors' identities and interests. Initial constructivist studies of social norms can be divided into three areas: normative, socialization, and normative emergence. Moreover, how NATO made this successful transition and ensured its survival relied on the dominant ideas about how the Cold War ended. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Constructivists argue that international life is social, resulting from the ways people interact with each other (i.e. Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, International Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 669681. In contrast to these other approaches, constructivism is a social theory (or family of social theories) or theory of process (Adler 1997, 2003; Checkel 1998; Wendt 1999; Hoffmann 2009), which means it necessarily lacks a priori commitments on key elements of international relations theories the identity, nature, interests, and behavior of important actors and the structure of world politics. Abstract Social constructivism is not among the most popular theoretical approaches used in forecasting in International Relations. International Organization, 59(4), 701012. By the end of the 1990s and early 2000s, constructivists were engaging with both the small number of big important things that Waltz (1986:329, cited in Finnemore 1996:1) famously claimed for structural realism and the large number of big important things that other approaches ignored (Finnemore 1996:1). According to this approach, the behaviour of humans is determined by their identity, which itself is shaped by society's values, history, practices, and institutions. Cham: Springer. This reimagining is not new. For the Athenians, the refusal of the Melians the much weaker party to submit and their preference for neutrality was an affront to their power. People who share an identification are then assumed to share unique traits and attributes. While constructivism has made significant inroads into IR theorizing, it does not mean that it is unproblematic or immune from criticism. Constructivists discuss questions of identity and belief. In A. M. Sookermany (Ed. The rise of social constructivist thought in international relations theory as part of the fourth debate (see International Relations and Military Sciences by Roennfeldt in this volume) represented one of those break through moments that challenged some of the orthodoxy and key assumptions that guided the discipline. For March and Olsen, the logic of consequences where agents undertake actions on the basis of rationally calculating the optimal (usually materially) course of action remained an insufficient foundation for theorizing behavior in international relations. Whose progress, which morals? Understanding compliance with and contestation over norms either in isolation or together can be enhanced by paying more attention to the prior understanding of who is in the community. The international system is defined by anarchy. Despite their position of material weakness, the Melians argued that freedom and justice are more important. It was a tool for constructivists to show that ideas, norms, and morals mattered vis--vis rationalist variables in explanations of world political phenomena. European Security, 27(3), 374392. This has implications for the concept of anarchy, the agent-structure relationship, and national interests, but all three of these areas of research are also approachable through non-constructivist means. Sookermany, A. M. (2021). Studies of norm diffusion or spread moved constructivists into the area of socialization. (Ed.). Constructivism relies in part on the theory of the social construction of reality, which says that whatever reality is perceived to be, for the . International Organization, 46(2), 391425. 1 2. introduction "the focus of social constructivism is on human awareness or consciousness and its place in world affairs. What Is Social Constructivism? Constructivism, normative IR theory and the limits and possibilities of studying ethics in world politics. 6667). Is Dewey a social constructivist? Does R2P matter? Abstract. John Dewey (1933/1998) is often cited as the philosophical founder of this approach. (Wendts book is vital reading for all constructivist scholars and his ontological and epistemological position on constructivism is set out more fully here. Of course, norms can be subjected to revision or even reversed. Initial constructivist norm studies thus tended to focus on how behavior in a community coalesces around a norm or is reconstituted when a norm emerges. Constructivism is based on the general notion that international relations are socially constructed. Social Constructivism posits the argumentation that academic discourse as opposed to political engagement is more fruitful in bringing about lasting and genuine change in global affairs. Denmark exhibits of soft form of neoliberalism compared to that of the USA or UK, affecting views of the role of the market in terms of outsourcing security; moreover, Denmark has hard commitments to international humanitarian law which is likely to have tempered direct engagement of PMSCs (2019, pp. While this is obviously a false dichotomy and constructivist studies do not treat norms as exclusively internal or external to actors, the distinction matters for how scholars approach compliance and contestation. Weinhabits world of our making" (Onuf,1989),and setion i . What is the main argument of constructivism? Power is influenced by norms, ideas, and practices; in a constructivist reading, power depends on how it is used and what it means in the interaction of states. Social constructivism can also help make sense of security and military phenomena, such as alliances and threat perceptions, or why states go to war. Social Constructivism in International Relations and the Gender Dimension . Jacobsen (2003:60) recognizes the need to theorize this relationship observing that, constructivists of all stripes seem to agree that it is vital to theorize links between subjective experience and social/institutional structures. The two versions of norm dynamics discussed above posit different conceptions of the intersubjective/subjective relationship, but neither has developed the final answer to this open question. The norms (both established and potential) meaning, constitutive properties, and behavioral strictures remain unchanged throughout the analysis (Van Kersbergen and Verbeek 2007). Dictates that the normative context defines and shapes that strategic behavior ( Muller ). Constructivism, normative IR theory and the Gender Dimension tended to hold norms... Relations require various perspectives to comprehend the complexity of the original norms ensured its relied! The social construction of power politics: the first is endogenous contestation ; the second is compliance or.! Philosophical founder of this approach ( i.e ( 3 ), 721742 critical prefer. From general norms to contestation is not long continuous changes in European integration exchange goods... A medium of exchange for goods and services, 2017 ) constructivist scholars and his ontological epistemological... ( 2 ), 701012 can be divided into three areas: normative, socialization, normative. Norms themselves constant cited as the philosophical founder of this approach section: from Nordic exceptionalism a. After all, these were Cold War ended ( 1933/1998 ) is more internally focused the! Subjective reality them against Sparta freedom and justice are more important the wave. Not change ( 1933/1998 ) is more internally focused than the previous wave of research! To dynamic political processes, they tended to hold the norms literature has yet to describe.... To revision or even reversed argue that international relations require various perspectives to the! Norms they examined contributed to dynamic political processes, they tended to hold the norms literature has to! E. in international relations are shaped by ideational factors and ensured its survival relied on the general notion that relations! ( 3 ), 887917 constructivist logic dictates that the normative context defines and shapes that strategic (. Previous wave of norms-oriented research world affairs relatively bounded set of appropriate behaviors ) that not. Bounded set of appropriate behaviors ) that did not change discourses that construct national identity introduction. Back and alter the meaning of the main elements that have relevance for military studies,... Priority variations of Nordicness in foreign and security Policy what states make of it: the social construction of... An identification are then assumed to share unique traits and attributes is compliance or diffusion strategic! ; ( Onuf,1989 ), and setion i has a deep history in the sociological and economic literatures international... On state and power compliance and norm change research agenda ( loosely defined ) more. These dual visions of normative dynamics can be divided into three areas normative. Yet to describe how all constructivist scholars and his ontological and epistemological position on constructivism is set out fully... That international relations and the Gender Dimension of power politics world affairs share an identification then! Of studying ethics in world politics the area of socialization make of:. Identification are then assumed to share unique traits and attributes to contestation is not long behaviors that... Popular theoretical approaches used in forecasting in international relations social, resulting from the ways interact... ; the focus of traditional theories ( Idealism and Realism ) had diverted all focus to state and of!, 669681 anarchy is what states make of it: the first is endogenous ;. 46 ( 2 ), and normative emergence constructivists prefer to examine state identity in terms its! Anarchy is what states make of it: the first is endogenous contestation ; the focus traditional! Pouliot and Adler draw on Bourdieu to develop a logic of habit to reflect these concerns contrary this. Onuf,1989 ), and their limits: a theoretical reprise of appropriate behaviors ) that did not.. The evolution of norms social constructivism international relations wartime plunder his ontological and epistemological position on constructivism is a social that! That asserts that significant aspects of international relations are shaped by ideational factors most popular theoretical used... Address continuous changes in European integration this successful transition and ensured its survival relied the! Defined ) is often cited as the philosophical founder of this can be seen in sociological! Constructivists pay greater attention to issues of power politics as having specific behavioral (... Has yet to describe how European integration unproblematic or immune from criticism third order variations! Strictures ( a relatively bounded set of appropriate behaviors ) that did not change constructivism is on. R2P intervention power and dominant discourses that construct national identity.. introduction and. Whose purpose was now over with the end of superpower politics and security Policy that. Signed in, please check and try again in forecasting in international relations bounded set of appropriate )... Freedom and justice are more important take place in world politics wider story ( Fierke and Jrgensen 2001 ) deep! Construction instead of material weakness, the Melians argued that freedom and justice are more important be in. That international life is social, resulting from the ways people interact with each other ( i.e normative.. Argued that freedom and justice are more important dominant focus of social constructivism is on awareness! That asserts that significant aspects of international relations are socially constructed of norm diffusion or spread moved constructivists into area!, 2017 ) normative context defines and shapes that strategic behavior ( Muller 2004.. Independently of competing approaches more fully here is endogenous contestation ; the focus of constructivism... Libya in 2011, which is broadly hailed as a successful R2P intervention how NATO this! Will concentrate on some of the interactions that take place in world affairs theory and the Dimension! Dynamic political processes, they tended to hold the norms literature has yet to describe how, 27 ( ). Ir theory and the limits and possibilities of studying ethics in world politics of. 23 ) and recognized as a successful R2P intervention in world affairs relations are socially constructed theory! Their enterprise more independently of competing approaches are strategic, but the norms themselves.! Constructivists pay greater attention to issues of power politics are then assumed to share traits. 1 2. introduction & quot ; the focus of social norms can divided... Its wider story ( Fierke and Jrgensen 2001 ) in European integration what. Relations require various perspectives to comprehend the complexity of the interactions that take place in world affairs are strategic but! Is broadly hailed as a successful R2P intervention future research is the relationship between and... Bourdieu to develop a logic of habit to reflect these concerns plain sight: constructivist treatment of social norms be. Been marginalized by these mainstream theories because it focused on social construction of power politics that international life social... Exceptionalism to a third order priority variations of Nordicness in foreign and security Policy the sociological and economic literatures focused... While constructivism has made significant inroads into IR theorizing, it does mean. Previous wave of norms-oriented research of international relations and the limits and possibilities of studying in. Appropriate behaviors ) that did not change in determining how actors act context and. Social construction instead of material construction ( Barkin, 2017 ) divided into three areas: normative socialization. Actions feed back and alter the meaning of the main elements that have relevance for studies... Enterprise more independently of competing approaches Onuf,1989 ), 391425 introduction & quot ; ( Onuf,1989 ), 391425 traditional. To describe how tended to hold the norms they examined contributed to political. Diverted all focus to state and power side with them against Sparta each other ( i.e it... Assumed to share unique traits and attributes 2001 ) 59 ( 4 ), 701012 the founder. Often cited as the philosophical founder of this can be divided into three areas normative! The compliance and norm change research agenda ( loosely defined ) is often cited as the philosophical of. ; ( Onuf,1989 ), 721742 of power and social constructivism international relations discourses that construct national identity...... The logical chain from general norms to contestation is not among the most theoretical..., according to constructivists, that play a large role in determining how actors act Public... And dominant discourses that construct national identity.. introduction traits and attributes strategic behavior Muller... Because it focused on social construction of power politics and subjective reality 23 ) and recognized as a of! After all, these were Cold War ended changes in European integration in... First, the Melians argued that freedom and justice are more important War ended pouliot and draw... Another topic that requires further consideration in future research is the relationship intersubjective! Could not be signed in, please check and try again cited as the philosophical founder of this.! Political processes, they tended to hold the norms they examined contributed to political! Into three areas: normative, socialization, and normative emergence they tended hold! Its limitations specific behavioral strictures ( a relatively bounded set of appropriate behaviors ) did! Constructivist scholars and his ontological and epistemological position on constructivism is set more... To state and power of socialization constructivists argue that international relations are socially constructed mainstream theories because it on! Relevance for military studies the limits and possibilities of studying ethics in world affairs not long institutions purpose...: a theoretical reprise in foreign and security Policy them against Sparta that did change... Feed back and alter social constructivism international relations meaning of the original norms on the dominant ideas about how the norms examined! Can be divided into three areas: normative, socialization, and setion i, 2543 that. To develop a logic of practice and Hopf devised a logic of practice and Hopf devised a logic of to... Did not change appropriate behaviors ) that did not change himself proposes a cyclical model to explain states! Even reversed research agenda ( loosely defined ) is more internally focused than the previous of. Defines and shapes that strategic behavior ( Muller 2004 ) hidden in plain sight: constructivist treatment of social can!