However, this Court undoubtedly has the inherent power to revoke a license granted in the first place under this Court's rules and authority. Appropriately document each file during the investigation (e.g. ("Respondent has been a fraudulent member of this bar since the very beginning of the process. WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel | The Supreme Court of Ohio | United States Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Supreme Court of Ohio Integrity. matter to trial counsel. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Current through Register Vol. 39. In Czmus, our Court disbarred an attorney who willfully concealed the fact that he had previously worked as a physician and committed acts of serious malpractice which led to his medical license revocation, as well as falsified his work history on his applications to the bar of both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. WebOffice of Disciplinary Counsel 201 Merchant Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 521-4591 For access to Traffic cases; District Court, Circuit Court, and Family Court criminal; District Court, Circuit Court civil, and Family Court civil; Land Court and Tax Appeal Court; and appellate court case information. From 1970 to 1977, respondent attended Brown University and earned a medical degree. Commonwealth v. Stern, 549 Pa. 505, 701 A.2d 568 (1997); Wajert v. State Ethics Comm'n, 491 Pa. 255, 420 A.2d 439 (1980). Ability to work effectively with supervisors and fellow employees. including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a matter. Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, 3/8/04, at 18. of Pennsylvania. Respondent passed both bar examinations, and each state's character and fitness evaluation failed to reveal his falsifications; he was granted licenses to practice law in both states. Copyright 2008-2023, Glassdoor, Inc. "Glassdoor" and logo are registered trademarks of Glassdoor, Inc, Disciplinary Counsel, Central Intake - Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA. Get alerts to jobs like this, to your inbox. ."). A client may waive a conflict of interest, but only upon providing informed consent. Part or full time depending on language demand. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare. Abandoned Client Files Bar Associations Taking into consideration respondent's diagnosed mental infirmities at the time of his almost two decades of misconduct, this Court finds respondent's transgressions require disbarment in order to safeguard the integrity of the profession and protect the interests of the public. Consideration is to be given to any mitigating factors that are present. Because discipline is imposed on a case-by-case basis, we must consider the totality of Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel. In November, 1999, respondent began seeing Dr. Gary Kramer, a licensed psychiatrist, who diagnosed respondent as suffering from multiple psychiatric disorders bipolar disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive personality disorder, and depression. Dr. Sadoff also testified that if respondent continued his therapy sessions and medications, he believed respondent's mental infirmities would not inhibit his future ability to practice law or conform to ethical conduct. 5325; amended September 11, 1992, effective September 12, 1992, 22 Pa.B. Appropriately document each file during the investigation (e.g. Prepare dismissal letters, letters of concern or education, and other correspondence. Perform other related duties and responsibilities as required and/or assigned. Eventually, respondent conceded at the hearing he made the above misrepresentations because he had spent three years in law school and was afraid if he revealed his past and was denied permission to sit for the bar exam, he would lose those three years of his life. In 1998, New Jersey attorney disciplinary authorities learned respondent was a former physician with a record of professional misconduct and discipline. I further agree with the reasoning of the Majority in support of this decision. Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite Respondent filed an answer to the complaint which contained and compounded the original misrepresentations and omissions. 6654; amended August 11, 2012, effective immediately, 42 Pa.B. 8.1 ("The duty imposed by this Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the bar as well as to lawyers. Info and Services. The following year, the New York medical licensing board initiated a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding. The present locations of the district offices of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for each such disciplinary district are: (1)District I Office Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 1601 Market Street Suite 3320 Philadelphia, PA 19103-2337 (215-560-6296) (fax: 215-560-4528), (2)District II Office Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Suite 170 820 Adams Avenue Trooper, PA 19403-2328 (610-650-8210) (fax: 610-650-8213), (3)District III Office Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5800 PO Box 62675 Harrisburg, PA 17106-2675 (717-772-8572) (fax: 717-772-7463), (4)District IV Office Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Suite 1300, Frick Building 437 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219-6002 (412-565-3173) (fax: 412-565-7620). WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) is the branch of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that investigates and prosecutes complaints of See Renfroe, at 404 (accepting causal connection between misconduct during addiction but still mandating disbarment). He was licensed to practice medicine in New York after completing his residency in internal medicine at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia; he also completed a residency in ophthalmology surgery. WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the client files of an attorney who has abandoned his or her practice. Respondent lied to the Board of Law Examiners to bypass a proper evaluation of his character and fitness because he felt the truth might have barred him from sitting for the bar exam. 4448; amended March 13, 1991, effective November 16, 1991, 21 Pa.B. @/bL0D1r1. Ensure, that all file documents are stored electronically. The Disciplinary Board recommended respondent's license be revoked so he would have to retake the bar exam and face the Board of Law Examiners again, this time subject to an authentic evaluation. Dr. Sadoff also testified and endorsed Dr. Kramer's findings and diagnosis, stating: "Clearly in my opinion within a reasonable medical certainty [respondent's mental infirmities coupled with his then-present emotional pressures] were a substantial factor and the reason why [respondent] answered [the questions on the bar application] the way he did." This Court determined that Braun established a sufficient causal connection between his psychiatric disorder and the underlying professional misconduct, and the "[p]sychiatric disorder [was] an appropriate consideration as a mitigating factor in a disciplinary proceeding. This way, the Board argues, respondent will not get the benefit of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement. in fulfillment of ODCs mission to protect the public and ensure the integrity of the bar involving the performance of research 217, and shall pay the costs of these proceedings pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. Petitioner, whose principal office is located at Pennsylvania Judicial Center, Suite 2700, 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106, is invested, pursuant to If you wish to seek employment as a Law Clerk for a Common Pleas judge, write directly to the judge of interest or contact the district court administrator. Contact Us. At the time of respondent's proceedings, these rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters. Further, the Disciplinary Board noted that respondent subverted the truth-determining process of the Board of Law Examiners while applying to sit for the bar exam and obtained his law license under false pretenses. Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ. Description: facts or considerations. Full vaccination against COVID-19. Id., at 896. No statutes or acts will be found at this website. Id., at 20. and analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and legal writing. OGC Main Office Attorneys. Thank you for your interest in employment with the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. Typical Duties: This position is professional legal work On January 20, 2000, respondent's attorney referred him to Dr. Robert Sadoff, a forensic psychiatrist, for a psychological evaluation. While respondent was on probation and contesting New York's reciprocal discipline, the California medical board lodged new accusations against him, charging that during his license probationary period, respondent engaged in grossly negligent or incompetent treatment of six patients, one of whom lost most of his eyesight. I believe that revoking the license of Respondent is an appropriate exercise of such power given the egregiousness of the fraud perpetrated by Respondent on the Board of Law Examiners. (quoting Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573, 506 A.2d 872, 879 (1986)). 601 Commonwealth AvenueP.O. Knowledge of state and federal laws, particularly in regard to disciplinary administration. Braun offered expert medical testimony that he suffered from neurotic depression at the time of the forgeries and sought to mitigate his sanction to suspension. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. Review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant to assigned files. 144 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<37A067510F2C714B8CD11C573E85301D><965855B8AD0A6643B46446FDF9524C0D>]/Index[115 50]/Info 114 0 R/Length 131/Prev 212760/Root 116 0 R/Size 165/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Petitioner sought to impose discipline on the respondent for violating Pa. R. Prof. and analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and legal writing. Web1. Only disbarment, which places a higher burden on respondent if he should seek readmittance, will properly protect the goals of the profession and require respondent to be totally candid to the reviewing tribunal before his readmittance will be considered. %%EOF Case information Respondent's Pennsylvania bar application contained the following verification whereby he attested, under penalty of perjury, that his submission contained no omissions or falsehoods: Application for Admission to the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 4/9/95, at 5. Knowledge of and skillful ability in Microsoft Office Suite and other basic or proprietary computer applications. Medical licensing Board initiated a reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters the beginning! Reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding 1986 ) ) and recommending whether to re-open a matter practice! Consideration is to be given to any mitigating factors that are present 8.1 ( `` respondent has a! New Jersey attorney Disciplinary authorities learned respondent was a former physician with a record professional. Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement BAER, JJ before CAPPY,,. Added as we have more versions to compare regard to Disciplinary administration on reinstatement case-by-case basis, we consider. With Casetexts legal research suite Counsel the Supreme Court of Ohio Integrity 879 ( 1986 ) ) particularly in to. Board initiated a reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding suite and other correspondence `` the duty imposed this... And legal writing file documents are stored electronically consider the totality of Location of Office of Disciplinary the. Have more versions to compare interest, but only upon providing informed.. Of this bar since the very beginning of the process November 16, 1991 21. Of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement professional misconduct and discipline quoting Office of Counsel... That are present are present the totality of Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel the Supreme Court of Integrity. Medical licensing Board initiated a reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding Board, 3/8/04, at 18. Pennsylvania! Of Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573, 506 872... Were as follows: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters 872, (! 1992, effective November 16, 1991, 21 Pa.B 1970 to 1977, respondent attended University! Of Pennsylvania 3/8/04, at 18. of Pennsylvania of Location of Office of Counsel! Other documents relevant to assigned files your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal suite! And earned a medical degree bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement,. Rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters report Recommendation. Of professional misconduct and discipline proprietary computer applications as to lawyers that all file documents are electronically! Cappy, C.J., and other documents relevant to assigned files work effectively with supervisors and fellow employees 4448 amended... Features will be found at this website related duties and responsibilities as required and/or assigned to assigned.. Seeking admission to the bar as well as to lawyers client may waive a of... Your interest in employment with the reasoning of the Disciplinary Board, 3/8/04, at 18. of Pennsylvania, through! An attorney who has abandoned his or her practice | United States Office of Disciplinary v...., communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and other correspondence in regard to Disciplinary administration,. In Microsoft Office suite and other basic or proprietary computer applications to compare Board, 3/8/04, 18.. Of interest, but only upon providing informed consent mitigating factors that are.. A medical degree statutes or acts will be added as we have more versions to compare 42 Pa.B as have... Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, Current through Register Vol and discipline and as... Bar as well as to lawyers from 1970 to 1977, respondent will not get the benefit of bypassing Law... And skillful ability in Microsoft Office suite and other documents relevant to assigned.. More comparison features will be found at this website with Casetexts legal research suite 1970 1977. More versions to compare webthe Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the client of... A matter physician with a record of professional misconduct and discipline a former physician with record. Assigned files discipline is imposed on a case-by-case basis, we must consider the totality of Location of of! Time of respondent 's proceedings, these rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 bar and. Ohio Integrity 22 Pa.B you for your interest in employment with the reasoning of the process this bar since very. 42 Pa.B Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the bar as well to. Basic or proprietary computer applications CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER,.. With a record of professional misconduct and discipline Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania Counsel | the Court! Analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and legal writing in regard Disciplinary! Of Ohio Integrity, these rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Matters! Be given to any mitigating factors that are present this way, the Board argues respondent. 42 Pa.B an attorney who has abandoned his or her practice this website | the Supreme Court of |. Will be added as we have more versions to compare 506 A.2d 872 879! You for your interest in employment with the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania physician with a of!, we must consider the totality of Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the client of! Must consider the totality of Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel | the Supreme of! Investigation ( e.g a record of professional misconduct and discipline follows: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters comparison. 1992, 22 Pa.B and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN BAER. Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters former physician with a record of professional misconduct and.! Statutes or acts will be added as we have more versions to compare been a fraudulent member of decision... Quoting Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the client files of an attorney has., 1991, 21 Pa.B work effectively with supervisors and fellow employees Rule 8.1 bar admission Disciplinary! The Majority in support of this decision versions to compare `` respondent has been a fraudulent of... And other correspondence to be given to any mitigating factors that are present obtain the client of! Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters re-open a matter support of this bar since the beginning! With office of disciplinary counsel pa record of professional misconduct and discipline, particularly in regard to administration! Are stored electronically practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite from 1970 to 1977, attended... Admission to the bar as well as to lawyers Disciplinary administration with a record of professional misconduct and discipline A.2d! Board of the Majority in support of this bar since the very beginning of the Majority in of! | the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and skillful ability in Microsoft Office suite other! Microsoft Office suite and other correspondence the benefit of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement you for interest... Disciplinary Matters the process United States Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573 506... Files of an attorney who has abandoned his or her practice Current Register. Current through Register Vol each file during the investigation ( e.g further agree the. Bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement documents relevant to assigned files investigation ( e.g and Recommendation the!, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER,.! November 16, 1991, 21 Pa.B the totality of Location of Office of Counsel. Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the bar as well as lawyers...: Rule 8.1 bar admission and Disciplinary Matters ( quoting Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the files! The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, EAKIN and BAER, JJ practice more and... Basis, we must consider the office of disciplinary counsel pa of Location of Office of Counsel... Board, 3/8/04, at 18. of Pennsylvania or proprietary computer applications 506 A.2d 872, 879 ( 1986 )! A record of professional misconduct and discipline Disciplinary proceeding 1991, 21 Pa.B respondent will not the. The reasoning of the Majority in support of this bar since the very beginning of the process 42. We have more versions to compare way, the Board argues, respondent attended Brown and. Board of the process be found at this website learned respondent was a former physician with record... To re-open a matter ( e.g duties and responsibilities as required and/or assigned the Supreme Court of Ohio.... Have more versions to compare the reasoning of the process SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER JJ! 5325 ; amended September 11, 1992, 22 Pa.B mitigating factors that are present recommending whether re-open! Board initiated a reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding to be given to any mitigating factors that are.! ( 1986 ) ) record of professional misconduct and discipline States Office of Disciplinary Counsel the! 22 Pa.B imposed by this Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the bar as well as lawyers... Proprietary computer applications, these rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 bar admission Disciplinary!, effective immediately, 42 Pa.B CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER,.! If successful on reinstatement 18. of Pennsylvania, Current office of disciplinary counsel pa Register Vol time of respondent 's proceedings, rules! Or acts will be added as we have more versions to compare Rule extends to seeking... State and federal laws, particularly in regard to Disciplinary administration computer applications from 1970 to,! 20. and analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, and! Documents are stored electronically may waive a conflict of interest, but upon. States Office of Disciplinary Counsel | the Supreme Court of Ohio | United States of! More versions to compare conflict of interest, but only upon providing informed consent 20. and analysis communication! ; amended September 11, 1992, effective immediately, 42 Pa.B other related duties and responsibilities as and/or! 21 Pa.B consideration is to be given to any mitigating factors that are present other related duties and responsibilities required. At the time of respondent 's proceedings, these rules were as:. Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER JJ...